Brand
Get Your FREE Case Review 24 Hours A Day
To protect your safety during the coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis, we offer telephone and video conferences, in addition to face-to-face meetings. Please contact our office today to set up a remote consultation.
Arrow
Mesothelioma
& Asbestos
Mesothelioma
& Asbestos

Learn more about mesothelioma, symptoms & treatment, frequently asked questions and more.
Arrow
Mesothelioma
& Asbestos
Mesothelioma
& Asbestos

Learn more about mesothelioma, symptoms & treatment, frequently asked questions and more.
Arrow
Mass Torts, Defective Drugs & Products
Mass Torts, Defective Drugs & Products
We help victims of dangerous drugs (Actos, Mirena, Lipitor, etc.) and faulty devices (hip implants, pacemakers, etc.)
Arrow
Mass Torts, Defective Drugs & Products
Mass Torts, Defective Drugs & Products
We help victims of dangerous drugs (Actos, Mirena, Lipitor, etc.) and faulty devices (hip implants, pacemakers, etc.)
Arrow
Personal Injury &
Workers' Compensation
Personal Injury &
Workers' Compensation

We help clients who need assistance with work-related injuries linked to asbestos and other serious problems.
Arrow
Personal Injury &
Workers' Compensation
Personal Injury &
Workers' Compensation

We help clients who need assistance with work-related injuries linked to asbestos and other serious problems.

Scientific advisory committee critical of EPA’s asbestos report

| Oct 7, 2020 | Uncategorized |

For many years, Americans have accepted and valued the role that science can play in advancing human life. The nation’s scientists were the first to send a man to the moon, develop personal computers, and break countless technological barriers. Good science can also protect the environment and improve human health.

So, why would anyone want to make use of second-rate science? Why would anyone fail to use all the data available to them to find real solutions to real problems? These are just two of the questions that lurk behind one science advisory committee’s recent rebuke of the EPA’s draft asbestos risk report.

Heres why the report and its recent rebuke both matter

The EPA recently published a draft asbestos risk evaluation meant to explore the dangers that the carcinogenic mineral presents to public health. This report matters because, as some chemical safety advocates note, it will help shape government policy. A more urgent message could prompt a more robust response. It could lead to stronger rules and regulations.

Instead, the Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) that was asked to provide a peer review of the report claimed that it was “not considered adequate.” As a result, the committee said it had “low confidence” in the report’s conclusions. In other words, one might claim the report “is fundamentally flawed and understates the serious risks of asbestos to public health.” At least, that was the interpretation provided by the president of the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization (ADAO).

Downplaying the risks could lead to softer regulation and more negative health outcomes. So, why would SACC and the ADAO claim the report was faulty? There were several reasons:

  • Most notably, the report failed to consider the dangers of “legacy” asbestos. Instead, it focused solely on current uses instead of the tons of material already baked into the American environment. But, as we know from the tragic tales of one Philadelphia teacher and other similar victims, legacy asbestos presents a genuine problem.
  • The report ignored most forms of asbestos. Asbestos isn’t a single mineral. It’s a term used to describe a group of several similar and related minerals. But the EPA’s report focused on just one of those minerals. Accordingly, its narrow focus on chrysotile means that it completely fails to account for all other forms of asbestos and asbestos-like materials.
  • The report did not address the risks tied to environmental exposure.
  • The data focused on a narrow group of people. It addressed only those who worked in several targeted industries, ignoring the risks presented to everyone else.
  • The report did not address the risks presented by asbestos fragments in talcum products. Despite the tremendous attention paid to the recent revelation, Johnson & Johnson knew its baby powder might contain asbestos.

The SACC and ADAO argue these are serious oversights. Anyone of them could seriously downplay the risks associated with asbestos exposure. Anyone of them could lead to flawed findings and flawed legislation. But there’s not just one oversight; there are several.

Exceptions to science

While the EPA’s report may be flawed due to its oversights, there’s perhaps an even greater flaw in the U.S. response to asbestos. While most other developed nations have now banned the substance outright, the United States keeps carving out exceptions for different forms of use.

Nearly 40,000 Americans die every year from mesothelioma and other cancers linked to asbestos, and scientists are still working to ensure the risks of asbestos are fully recognized.

Mesothelioma Lawyers and Personal Injury Attorneys
Get a Free Case Review!

Archives

FindLaw Network

Why Choose The Gori Law Firm?

Experience

With over 100 years of combined legal experience, we guide our clients through the litigation process by addressing questions and concerns and about the outcome every step of the way. Read More

Results

The team at The Gori Law Firm fights hard for clients, working to get the compensation and the settlement they deserve, obtaining over $3 billion in verdicts and settlements for our clients. Read More

Team Approach

We are more than just experienced attorneys: our team is also made up of highly trained paralegals and professionals specially trained to deal with the demands of these complex cases. Read More

Faster Trial Dates
We know that obtaining funds in a timely manner will help cover medical expenses. The Gori Law Firm works quickly to recover funds and secure the earliest possible trial dates on our client's behalf. Read More

Recognition

  • Super Lawyers
  • Million Dollar Advocates Forum
  • American Association for Justice
  • ABA Defending Liberty Pursuing Justice
  • Illinois State Bar Association

Fill Out Our Form Today To Get A Free Case Review.

Get a Free Case Review Today