The Gori Law Firm
Get Your FREE Case Review 24 Hours A Day
To protect your safety during the coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis, we offer telephone and video conferences, in addition to face-to-face meetings. Please contact our office today to set up a remote consultation.
Arrow
Mesothelioma
& Asbestos
Mesothelioma
& Asbestos

Learn more about mesothelioma, symptoms & treatment, frequently asked questions and more.
Arrow
Mesothelioma
& Asbestos
Mesothelioma
& Asbestos

Learn more about mesothelioma, symptoms & treatment, frequently asked questions and more.
Arrow
Mass Torts, Defective Drugs & Products
Mass Torts, Defective Drugs & Products
We help victims of dangerous drugs (Actos, Mirena, Lipitor, etc.) and faulty devices (hip implants, pacemakers, etc.)
Arrow
Mass Torts, Defective Drugs & Products
Mass Torts, Defective Drugs & Products
We help victims of dangerous drugs (Actos, Mirena, Lipitor, etc.) and faulty devices (hip implants, pacemakers, etc.)
Arrow
Personal Injury &
Workers' Compensation
Personal Injury &
Workers' Compensation

We help clients who need assistance with work-related injuries linked to asbestos and other serious problems.
Arrow
Personal Injury &
Workers' Compensation
Personal Injury &
Workers' Compensation

We help clients who need assistance with work-related injuries linked to asbestos and other serious problems.

Decision To Limit Payments To Asbestos Victims Stands

On Behalf of | Dec 5, 2014 | Mesothelioma/Asbestos-Related Illness |

The judge in a federal bankruptcy court has reaffirmed the decision to keep the record closed regarding the gasket maker Garlock. Garlock is one of countless companies that declared bankruptcy after exposing countless victims to asbestos in its products. Garlock has been accused of withholding evidence in cases involving asbestos exposure and mesothelioma tied to its products. The federal judge closed the record in a January decision and reaffirmed that decision this week.

The January decision reduced the amount Garlock was ordered to pay asbestos victims by nearly $1 billion. The judge re-set the amount to approximately $125 million. At the heart of the initial decision were accusations that some of suits against Garlock involved withheld evidence that victims were exposed to multiple sources of asbestos. If a person develops mesothelioma after having been exposed to asbestos by numerous companies, it is impossible to tell which product carried the fibers that caused the illness. Withholding evidence of exposure by some or all of the companies other than Garlock would lead to a larger claim against one company. 

Asbestos cases often involve apportionment of liability. Different states have different standards for determining the percentage of responsibility one company might bear when several companies exposed a person to asbestos. An important part of selecting an attorney to handle a mesothelioma case is finding someone with the experience to demonstrate liability and seek the full compensation to which you are entitled. The issues can be complex and require the attention of an experienced advocate.

Source: WFAE 90.7, “Federal Bankruptcy Judge Reaffirms Landmark Asbestos Decision,” by Michael Tomsic, 5 December 2014 

Mesothelioma Lawyers and Personal Injury Attorneys

Get a Free Case Review!

Archives

FindLaw Network